Bien-être au travail et performance innovante des salariés : le rôle médiateur du capital psychologique. Une étude auprès des enseignants-chercheurs d’universités françaises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cet article est de tester les effets réciproques du bien-être au travail et de la performance innovante des salariés, et l’effet médiateur du capital psychologique sur ces relations. S’appuyant sur une étude empirique menée auprès de 400 enseignants-chercheurs d’universités françaises, les résultats de la recherche révèlent des effets réciproques positifs et significatifs entre le bien-être au travail et la performance innovante. En outre, ils montrent que le capital psychologique a un effet médiateur positif sur ces relations. Une spirale vertueuse, médiatisée par le capital psychologique des individus, semble se dessiner entre le bien-être au travail et la performance innovante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".