HUBUNGAN ANTARA FAKTOR SOSIODEMOGRAFI DAN PENGGUNAAN MEDIA SOSIAL TERHADAP PERILAKU SEKS PRA-NIKAH REMAJA BALI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kesehatan reproduksi dan seksualitas merupakan topik yang dianggap tabu untuk dibicarakan di Indonesia, sehingga remaja mencari alternatif untuk mendapatkan informasi mengenai topik tersebut. Media sosial secara langsung ataupun tidak langsung menjadi media pembelajaran dan memberikan pengaruh bagi remaja, salah satunya tentang kesehatan reproduksi dan perilaku seksual. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan rancangan online survey cross-sectional terhadap 418 responden remaja berumur 20-24 tahun dari 9 kabupaten/kota di Bali dari Maret hingga April 2021. Meski remaja cukup aktif menggunakan media sosial, sebagian besar remaja (58.85%) jarang mengakses informasi kesehatan reproduksi melalui platform tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini juga menunjukan bahwa penggunaan media sosial dalam perannya sebagai media pembelajaran kesehatan reproduksi tidak memberikan pengaruh preventif secara langung terhadap perilaku seksual pra-nikah remaja. Namun variabel lain seperti status bekerja, jenis kelamin, umur dan pengalaman berpacaran memiliki pengaruh terhadap perilaku seksual pranikah pada remaja Bali usia 20-24 tahun.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".