Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the differences in patient outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of displaced, type II distal clavicle fractures. Design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Level I trauma centers. Patients/Participants: Patients with completely displaced type II distal clavicle fractures were included. Fifty-seven patients were randomized: 27 to the operative group and 30 to the nonoperative group. Intervention: Patients randomized to nonoperative care received a standard shoulder sling, followed by pendulum or gentle range of motion shoulder exercises at any time as directed by the attending surgeon. Patients randomized to the operative group received plate fixation with a precontoured distal clavicular plate or a “hook” plate within 28 days from injury. Main Outcome Measure: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores at 1 year. Results: There were no between-group differences in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand or Constant scores at 1 year. More patients in the operative group went on to union (95% vs. 64%, P = 0.02) within 1 year. Twelve patients in the operative group underwent a second operation for implant removal (12/27, 44%). In the nonoperative group, 6 patients (6/30, 20%) subsequently underwent 8 operative procedures. Conclusion: Although this study failed to demonstrate a difference in functional outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures, nonoperative management led to more complications including a moderate rate of nonunion, which often required secondary surgery to correct, a higher rate of early dissatisfaction with shoulder appearance, and a delayed return to activities in the first 6 months. Operative management provided a safe and reliable treatment option with few complications, but often required secondary implant removal, especially with hook plate fixation. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".