Coarctation of the Aorta in Adolescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Although coarctation of the aorta (CoAo) is a congenital anomaly, it can pose a diagnostic challenge in those presenting beyond neonatal period, as some patients can remain asymptomatic until complications of hypertension develop later in life. Careful physical examination can play an important role in timely diagnosis and prevention of complications. We present 2 cases of adolescents with undiagnosed CoAo who both presented with nonspecific headaches and hypertension. Both were initially misdiagnosed as essential hypertension until careful detailed physical examination later detected weak/absent femoral pulses and discrepancy in upper and lower limb blood pressures. These findings raised the clinical suspicion of CoAo, which was confirmed on further investigations. Our cases highlight the importance of considering CoAo in the differential diagnosis of hypertension in adolescents. These cases also stress the significance of detailed cardiac examination including 4-limb blood pressure and femoral pulses in a patient presenting to the emergency department with high blood pressure irrespective of the primary complaint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".