De la comunidad a lo común: desplazamientos teóricos, éticos y políticos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo interrogamos dos conceptos capitales de la filosofía y la teoría social actuales: la “comunidad” y “lo común”. Nuestra hipótesis de lectura es que después de medio siglo de vigencia el debate sobre la cuestión de la comunidad comenzó a ceder lugar de manera progresiva al debate acerca de lo común. Con el objetivo de explicar lo que interpretamos como un desplazamiento de carácter epistemológico, pero también ético y político, emprendemos un análisis sobre los usos, significados e implicaciones de ambos conceptos en un conjunto heterogéneo de discursos contemporáneos, de Jean-Luc Nancy y Roberto Esposito a Christian Laval y Pierre Dardot, pasando por Michael Hardt y Antonio Negri.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it