MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288070401 · doi:10.18280/ts.390307

A Novel Hyperparameter Optimization Aided Hand Gesture Recognition Framework Based on Deep Learning Algorithms

2022· article· en· W4288070401 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdullah Asım Yılmaz

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureComputer scienceHyperparameterArtificial intelligenceGesture recognitionDeep learningMachine learningField (mathematics)Artificial neural networkArchitectureSketch recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recognition of hand gestures in cluttered or complex environments is a vital research area in the human-computer interaction and computer vision fields due to its various potential applications, such as hand action analysis, driver hand behaviour monitoring, virtual reality, pose estimation, human action recognition, and sign language recognition. In order to create more reliable and efficient algorithms in this research field, various approaches have been suggested in recent years. However, a robust system is still elusive. For this reason, a new deep learning-based architecture for classifying hand gestures is suggested in this study; it is based on a hybrid model. The study makes two main contributions to the literature. The first is the creation of a new database for hand gesture recognition. The second is a novel hybrid architecture that combines two widely used pre-trained network models in an optimised manner, using a genetic algorithm for hyperparameter optimization. The proposed method comprises five main phases, namely, data acquisition, pre-processing, the design of the deep neural network architecture, hyperparameter optimization, the training of the proposed deep neural network architecture. The proposed method was tested on three comprehensive datasets. The experimental results reveal that the suggested method can effectively classify hand gestures with a high accuracy rate and that it outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207