Hubungan Pendidikan, Pola Asuh Orang Tua dan Status Gizi dengan Perkembangan Bahasa Anak Usia Prasekolah di Paud Wilayah Pemulutan Selatan Tahun 2021
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Child development develops so rapidly. Early childhood is a child who is experiencing early childhood, namely those aged between 2 to 6 years whose emotional abilities will be grown so that after adulthood they are more likely to have intelligence. This study aims to determine the relationship between Education, Parenting Patterns and Nutritional Status in Children with Language Development of Preschool Age Children in PAUD South Pemulutan Region, Ogan Ilir Regency in 2021. The design of this study was an analytical survey using a cross sectional research design. The population in this study were all parents who had children attending PAud Sungai Lebung Ulu 24 people, Paud Sungai Lebung 49 people and Paud Naikan Bakarg (NTB) 29 people, totaling 102 people and the number of samples was 50 respondents. The sampling technique used is Proportional Random Sampling by lottery. Data analysis used chi square statistical test with a value of 0.05. The results of the chi square test showed that there was a significant relationship between education, p value = 0.035, parenting patterns, p value = 0.002 and nutritional status = 0.004 with the language development of preschool-aged children. Midwives are expected to increase knowledge to parents about the development of preschool age children to further increase stimulation of children, especially to improve their language development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".