Partial Learning Using Partially Explicit Discretization for Multicontinuum/Multiscale Problems with Limited Observation: Dual Continuum Heterogeneous Poroelastic Media Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the poroelasticity problem in heterogeneous media. The mathematical model is described by a coupled system of equations for displacement and pressure in the coupled dual continuum porous media. We propose a new method based on hybrid explicit–implicit (HEI) learning to solve the poroelasticity problem in dual continuum heterogeneous media. We use a finite element method with standard linear basis functions for spatial approximation. We apply the explicit–implicit time scheme, where the explicit scheme is used for the low-conductive continuum and the implicit scheme for the high-conductive. The fixed-strain splitting scheme is used to accelerate the computation and decouple the flow and mechanics problems. The main idea of the proposed method is partial learning of particular degrees of freedom of the high-conductive continuum’s pressure (implicit part of the flow). First, we train a deep neural network (DNN) to obtain values of the implicit part of the flow at some spatial points at some time moments. Then, we apply the Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method (DEIM) combined with Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) to restore the complete implicit parts and perform linear interpolation over time. Consequently, we treat the high-conductive continuum’s pressure as a known function and use it to find the other continuum’s pressure and displacements. Numerical results for the two-dimensional model problem are presented. The results demonstrate that the proposed method provides fast and accurate predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".