Global fMRI signal topography differs systematically across the lifespan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The global signal (GS) in resting-state fMRI, known to contain artifacts and non-neuronal physiological signals, also contains important neural information related to individual state and trait characteristics. Here we show distinct linear and curvilinear lifespan patterns of GS topography in a cross-sectional lifespan sample, demonstrating its importance for consideration in studies of development and aging. Subcortical brain regions such as the thalamus and putamen show linear associations with the GS across the lifespan. The thalamus has stronger coupling in older-age individuals compared with younger-aged individuals, while the putamen has stronger coupling in younger individuals compared with older individuals. The subcortical nucleus basalis shows a u-shaped pattern similar to cortical regions within the lateral frontoparietal network and dorsal attention network, where coupling with the GS is stronger at early and old age, with weaker coupling in middle age. This differentiation in coupling strength between subcortical and cortical brain activity across the lifespan supports a dual-layer model of GS composition, where subcortical aspects of the GS are differentiated from cortical aspects of the GS. We find that these subcortical-cortical contributions to the GS depend strongly on the lifespan stage of individuals. Our findings demonstrate how neurobiological information within the GS differs across development and highlight the need to carefully consider whether or not to remove this signal when investigating age-related functional differences in the brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".