Dual-Layer Ranking Feature Selection Method Based on Statistical Formula for Driver Fatigue Detection of EMG Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electromyography (EMG) signals are one of the most studied inputs for driver drowsiness detection systems. As the number of EMG features available can be daunting, finding the most significant and minimal subset features is desirable. Hence, a simplified feature selection method is necessary. This work proposed a dual-layer ranking feature selection algorithm based on statistical formula f EMG signals for driver fatigue detection. In the beginning, in the first layer, 21 filter algorithms were calculated to rank 47 sets of EMG features (25 time-domain and 9 frequency-domain) and applied to six classifiers. Then, in the second layer, all the ranks were re-ranked based on the statistical formula (average, median, mode and variance). The classification performance of all rankings was compared along with the number of features. The highest classification accuracy achieved was 95% for 12 features using the Average Statistical Rank (ASR) and LDA classifier. It is conclusive that a combination of features from the time domain and frequency domain can deliver better performance compared to a single domain feature. Concurrently, the statistical rank ASR performed better than the single filter rank by reducing the number of features. The proposed model can be a benchmark for the enhanced feature selection method for EMG driver fatigue signal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".