Analisis Geologi dan Geomorfologi Kuantitatif Daerah Vulkanik Menggunakan Citra Landsat 8 dan TerraSAR-X (Studi Kasus Gunungapi Ungaran)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gunungapi Ungaran yang terletak di Kabupaten Semarang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, merupakan salah satu gunungapi aktif di Indonesia. Analisis geomorfologi kuantitatif menggunakan citra inderaan jauh dan pengamatan lapangan dapat membantu untuk mengetahui kondisi tatanan geologi di Gunungapi Ungaran. Intepretasi inderaan jauh berupa rona, tekstur, bentuk dan pola aliran pada citra Landsat 8 dengan kombinasi kanal 5, 6, 7 dan TerraSAR-X, dikombinasikan dengan hasil pengamatan lapangan. Tujuan studi ini untuk mengetahui kondisi geologi di sekutar Gunungapi Ungaran, khususnya sebaran batuan vulkanik dan struktur geologi. Analisis geomorfologi kuantitatif sinusitas muka gunung serta rasio dasar dan tinggi lembah digunakan untuk mengetahui kondisi tektonik. Berdasarkan hasil analisis citra satelit dan pemetaan geologi diketahui bahwa Gunungapi Ungaran terbagi menjadi 11 satuan batuan yang didominasi oleh batuan vulkanik dan batuan beku. Analisis geomorfologi kuantiantif menunjukkan Gunungapi Ungaran memiliki nilai lat 3 dan termasuk daerah dengan derajat tektonik rendah.Katakunci: Geomorfologi, Gunungapi Ungaran, inderaan jauh, kuantitatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".