MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288427154 · doi:10.1061/9780784484296.035

Erosion Experiments on Culverts and Sewers Using a New Test Facility

2022· article· en· W4288427154 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCulvertSanitary sewerErosionEnvironmental scienceCivil engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeologyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leakage through joints in rigid sewers or corrosion-induced perforations in corrugated steel culverts can result in ingress of groundwater and erosion of the surrounding fill. The loss of ground support may then compromise the ability of the sewer or culvert to support earth or vehicle loads. A new test facility at Queen’s University has been developed to undertake erosion experiments to measure the impact of erosion on sewer and culvert behavior. Use of the 5 m long, 3 m wide, and 4.5 m deep test pit to investigate the response of large diameter pipes under deep burial has been described previously, and this paper describes its use for erosion experiments. This is illustrated by outlining a test conducted on a corrugated steel pipe with 0.9 m diameter and perforations along the haunches. This test pipe was instrumented with optical fiber sensors around crests and valleys of the corrugated plate. It was then placed in the pit and backfilled with sand. After initial burial, wheel pair loading on the ground surface was applied through a steel plate, and strains were measured around the pipe circumference. Those strains then were used to obtain the distributions of hoop thrust and circumferential bending moment for this “intact soil” condition. The test pit permits experiments in saturated ground, and after raising the level of the groundwater, leakage through the perforations commenced, causing erosion of the surrounding fill. After lowering the groundwater level to stop the erosion, surface loading was again applied, and the resulting strains measured for the steel culvert with this deteriorated (eroded soil) condition. Comparisons of the pre-erosion and post-erosion responses reveal that there are very significant changes in the patterns and magnitudes of circumferential bending moment, with a large bending moment developing where the soil support was removed by erosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it