MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288439406 · doi:10.1061/9780784484272.011

Trans Mountain Corporation Overcomes Numerous Challenges to Construct the Trans Mountain Expansion Project

2022· article· en· W4288439406 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)CorporationGovernment (linguistics)Pipeline transportSubmarine pipelineScheduleEngineeringCivil engineeringBusinessComputer scienceFinanceEnvironmental engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project is the most largest technically challenging pipeline project ever constructed in Canada and possibly in North America. This project consists of 987 km (613 mi) of NPS 36 and NPS 42 pipeline, 11 pump stations, 3 berths, addition of 19 petroleum storage tanks, and elevation changes not normally designed for in liquid pipelines. The challenges are many and diverse. With similar challenging projects like Keystone XL being cancelled, Trans Mountain stands out in that this challenging project is under construction now with completion planned for late 2023. Challenges include environmental, regulatory, technical, geotechnical, geological, topographical, equipment, manpower, COVID-19, safety, schedule, public perception, design, and recent concerns in BC like fires, extreme temperatures, and overland flooding as well as others. Conceived by Kinder Morgan Corporation (KMC) as an expansion of its existing pipeline to expand offshore markets, ultimately the risk for the pipeline completion was such that KMC sold the pipeline to the Canadian government, essentially the people of Canada. It is very likely that once completed, Trans Mountain Corporation, the owners of the TMC system, will be sold to a major pipeline operator as the Canadian government is not in the pipeline operating business. This paper will outline where the project is now, how it got here, and how it managed all of the challenges faced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it