Proteins with multiple G protein-coupled receptor domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Currently known G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have a single transmembrane domain. Many GPCRs form dimers that have two transmembrane domains (one per protein), and there are indications that this dimeric interaction is functionally meaningful. Here, based on sequence analysis and structure predictions, we report the existence of 57 proteins with two, three, or four GPCR domains within the same protein chain. We analyze the structures of these multi-GPCRs and show that almost all have DRY/NPxxY motifs, a strong indication of signaling activity. By homology, most of the multi-GPCRs that we identified are olfactory-related; a few are chemokine-related. Multi-GPCR candidates are found in various Chordata species including fish, camel, marmite, Chinese hamster, and new world monkeys. The discovery of receptors with multiple transmembrane domains suggests the possibility for signal regulation and amplification within an individual receptor, revealing another step in GPCR evolution and a new layer of complexity in signal transduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".