A parsimonious description of global functional brain organization in three spatiotemporal patterns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The past decade of functional neuroimaging research has seen the application of increasingly sophisticated advanced methods to characterize intrinsic functional brain organization. Accompanying these techniques are a patchwork of empirical findings highlighting novel properties of intrinsic functional brain organization. To date, there has been little attempt to understand whether there is an underlying unity across this patchwork of empirical findings. Our study conducted a systematic survey of popular analytic techniques and their output on a large sample of resting-state fMRI data. We found that the apparent complexity of intrinsic functional brain organization can be seamlessly reduced to three fundamental low-frequency spatiotemporal patterns. Our study demonstrates that a long list of previously observed phenomena, including functional connectivity gradients, the task-positive/task-negative pattern, the global signal, time-lag propagation patterns, the quasiperiodic pattern and the network structure of the functional connectome are simply manifestations of these three spatiotemporal patterns. An in-depth characterization of these three spatiotemporal patterns using a novel time-varying complex pattern analysis revealed that these three patterns may arise from a single hemodynamic mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".