MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288457171 · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106272

A computed tomography imaging-based subject-specific whole-lung deposition model

2022· article· en· W4288457171 on OpenAlex
Xuan Zhang, Frank Li, Prathish K. Rajaraman, Jiwoong Choi, Alejandro P. Comellas, Eric A. Hoffman, Benjamin M. Smith, Ching‐Long Lin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsParticle depositionDeposition (geology)Lung volumesLungBiomedical engineeringFunctional residual capacityParticle (ecology)AirflowVentilation (architecture)TomographyAirwayAerosolMaterials scienceRadiologyPhysicsMedicineGeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The respiratory tract is an important route for beneficial drug aerosol or harmful particulate matter to enter the body. To assess the therapeutic response or disease risk, whole-lung deposition models have been developed, but were limited by compartment, symmetry or stochastic approaches. In this work, we proposed an imaging-based subject-specific whole-lung deposition model. The geometries of airways and lobes were segmented from computed tomography (CT) lung images at total lung capacity (TLC), and the regional air-volume changes were calculated by registering CT images at TLC and functional residual capacity (FRC). The geometries were used to create the structure of entire subject-specific conducting airways and acinar units. The air-volume changes were used to estimate the function of subject-specific ventilation distributions among acinar units and regulate flow rates in respiratory airway models. With the airway dimensions rescaled to a desired lung volume and the airflow field simulated by a computational fluid dynamics model, particle deposition fractions were calculated using deposition probability formulae adjusted with an enhancement factor to account for the effects of secondary flow and airway geometry in proximal airways. The proposed model was validated in silico against existing whole-lung deposition models, three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid and particle dynamics (CFPD) for an acinar unit, and 3D CFPD deep lung model comprising conducting and respiratory regions. The model was further validated in vivo against the lobar particle distribution and the coefficient of variation of particle distribution obtained from CT and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images, showing good agreement. Subject-specific airway structure increased the deposition fraction of 10.0-μm particles and 0.01-μm particles by approximately 10%. An enhancement factor increased the overall deposition fractions, especially for particle sizes between 0.1 and 1.0 μm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it