MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288463478 · doi:10.18280/ts.390325

Multi-Scale Edge Detection of Crack in Extra-High Arch Dam Based on Orthogonal Wavelet Construction

2022· article· en· W4288463478 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jianhua Zhang, Qiang Zhu, Fei Song, Lingchao Zhang, Juan Wang, Changjun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletBiorthogonal waveletWavelet packet decompositionMathematicsCascade algorithmStationary wavelet transformAlgorithmWavelet transformLifting schemeEdge detectionFilter (signal processing)CurveletUndercutArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceImage (mathematics)Image processingStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper conducts a research on the wavelet construction and application of image edge detection. Taking the image edge detection algorithm based on wavelet modulus maxima as the research subject, this paper discusses the problem of dislocation phenomenon, threshold selection, multi-scale edge fusion and evaluation criterion in the algorithm, and proposes an improved self-adaptive hierarchical threshold algorithm based on information amount and vanishing moment. From the angle of wavelet symmetry, filter composition and vanishing moment, the influence of wavelet property on image edge detection is studied, and the construction requirements of wavelet filter banks for image edge detection are proposed. The constant-length compactly supported biorthogonal wavelet parameterized construction method is used to construct the biorthogonal wavelet featuring odd symmetry for high-pass decomposition filter and unidirectionality for filter sequence, and the improved algorithm of wavelet construction and threshold is applied to the simulation of image edge detection of concrete cracks in ultra-high arch dam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207