Development and testing of a novel sulfur dioxide sonde
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel technique has been developed to measure sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) using a modification of the existing electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde technology. The current sonde-based method to measure SO 2 (i.e., the dual-sonde approach) involves launching two ozonesondes together, with one of the sondes having a filter to remove SO 2 at the inlet. The SO 2 profile is determined by taking the difference between the measurements from the two instruments. The dual-sonde method works well in typical tropospheric conditions when [O 3 ]>[SO 2 ] but saturates when [SO 2 ]>[O 3 ] and has large uncertainties in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere that would limit its effectiveness in measuring SO 2 from an explosive volcanic eruption. Due to these limitations, several modifications were made to create a single-sonde system that would directly measure SO 2 (i.e., the SO 2 sonde). These modifications included (1) a positively biased ECC current, (2) the addition of an O 3 removal filter, and (3) the addition of a sample dryer. The SO 2 sonde measures SO 2 as a reduction in the cell current. There was a strong correlation ( r 2 >0.94) between the SO 2 sonde and a Thermo 43 c analyzer during controlled laboratory tests and pre-flight tests. Varying humidity levels affected the SO 2 sonde's sensitivity (avg =84.6±31.7 ppbv µA −1 , 1 σ RSD =37 %) during initial field tests, which was resolved by adding a sample dryer upstream of the O 3 removal filter and pump inlet. This modification significantly reduced the variability and increased the sensitivity of the SO 2 measurements (avg =47±5.8 ppbv µA −1 , 1 σ RSD =12 %). Field tests included measurements near Kīlauea volcano (before and during the 2018 eruption of the Lower East Rift Zone), Costa Rica's Turrialba volcano, and anthropogenic plumes from the Athabasca oil sands region of Alberta, Canada. This single-SO 2 -sonde system is an effective, inexpensive instrument for measuring both ground-based and vertical profiles of SO 2 from anthropogenic and natural sources (i.e., volcanic eruptions) over a wide range of concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".