Des gardiens de l’ordre établi dans l’enseignement secondaire ? Le SNALC, la CNGA et la Société des agrégés face aux conséquences de Mai 1968
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Syndicat national des lycées et collèges (SNALC), Confédération nationale des groupes autonomes de l’enseignement public (CNGA) et la Société des agrégés se sont montrés hostiles aux réformes qui ont suivi Mai 68. Cependant, le discours de la CNGA et du SNALC est plus politique que celui de la Société des agrégés : ces deux syndicats estiment nécessaire de lutter non seulement pour le rétablissement de l’ordre, mais aussi contre la politique d’endoctrinement menée par les « totalitaires ». Inversement, du point de vue pédagogique, la Société des agrégés et le SNALC ont une attitude de refus plus radicale que la CNGA. De fait, le SNALC défend les valeurs traditionnelles (travail, effort, ordre, autorité, sélection, civisme, patrie), alors que la CNGA tente d’accorder sa promotion des valeurs libérales à un projet de réforme de l’enseignement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".