MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288658600

Carmen Aranegui Gascó, La Dama de Elche. Dónde, cuándo y por qué

2019· review· fr· W4288658600 on OpenAlexaff
Grégory Reimond

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2019
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of Medieval Iberia
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au sein du vaste répertoire des images de la culture ibérique parvenues jusqu’à nous, qu’il s’agisse des représentations humaines ou animales, de la grande sculpture en pierre, de la coroplathie, de la toreutique ou de la peinture sur vases, peu d’œuvres ont suscité une littérature aussi abondante que la Dame d’Elche. Malgré les découvertes spectaculaires faites depuis les années 1970 (la Dame de Baza, les groupes sculptés de Porcuna, la Dame — très fragmentaire — de Guardamar, etc.), le bust...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0090.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.404
GPT teacher head0.561
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHistorical Studies of Medieval IberiaFrench-language works237,207