MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288690798 · doi:10.1101/2022.07.27.499974

SpatialSort: A Bayesian Model for Clustering and Cell Population Annotation of Spatial Proteomics Data

2022· preprint· en· W4288690798 on OpenAlexafffund
Eric Lee, Kevin Chern, Michael Nissen, Xuehai Wang, C. Chris Huang, Anita K. Gandhi, Alexandre Bouchard‐Côté, Andrew P. Weng, Andrew Roth

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTerry Fox Research InstituteBC Cancer Agency
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBC Cancer FoundationMichael Smith Health Research BCCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchV Foundation for Cancer Research
KeywordsCluster analysisAnnotationComputer scienceBayesian probabilitySpatial analysisProteomicsPopulationSpace (punctuation)Data miningData scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Emerging spatial proteomics technologies have created new opportunities to move beyond quantifying the composition of cell types in tissue and begin probing spatial structure. However, current methods for analysing such data are designed for non-spatial data and ignore spatial information. We present SpatialSort, a spatially aware Bayesian clustering approach that allows for the incorporation of prior biological knowledge. SpatialSort clusters cells by accounting for affinities of cells of different types to neighbours in space. Additionally, by incorporating prior information about cell types, SpatialSort outperforms current methods and can perform automated annotation of clusters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207