MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288707878 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.20394300

Part 2 – Eigenfunction Expansion (EFE) Analysis of Cylindrical and Sectorial Metasurfaces

2022· preprint· en· W4288707878 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T. Smy, Shulabh Gupta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de la Défense Nationale
KeywordsEigenfunctionCurvatureDiscontinuity (linguistics)Shell (structure)WavelengthSurface (topology)RADIUSConductorDiffractionPhysicsOpticsMaterials scienceGeometryMathematical analysisMathematicsComputer scienceEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>This paper presents a formulation of an eigenfunction expansion (EFE) technique for the analysis of multi-shell cylindrical metasurface configurations and tests the validity of zero thickness sheet models for simulating practical structures. The formulation homogenizes the metasurface, modeling the surface as a zero-thickness discontinuity characterized by surface susceptibilities and allows for the incorporation of Perfect Electric Conductor (PEC) cores and partial cylindrical surfaces (arcs/sectors). A primary advantage of the method is that it is a fully rigorous semi-analytical approach and is well suited for investigating the limits of the zero thickness sheet models model via the Generalized Sheet Transition Conditions (GSTCs). Comparison to full-wave simulations in commercial solvers show that, for a thin deep sub-wavelength unit cell, single shell arcs with increasing curvatures (up to at least half of a wavelength in radius) are accurately captured by the use of the model. The simulations also show that the edge diffraction off the finite length arcs are well modeled. This is an important result as it indicates that susceptibilities extracted from full-wave unit-cell simulations assuming a flat periodic infinite surface are appropriate for use in high curvature finite surfaces. A second set of simulations showed that the EFE predicted multi-shell field distributions accurately when compared to unit-cell based simulations. A final set of simulations for single and double shell configurations is used to demonstrate the limitations of the GSTC approach for unit cells of appreciable thickness. Using a relatively thick unit cell (?7% of the excitation wavelength) and two different extraction models (cell edge and center) comparison to full-wave simulation shows that for resonant structures errors in field prediction are present. This is a clear indication that the zero-thickness assumption will break down for thick cells for some surface configurations. This paper demonstrates some clear advantages of the EFE approach; it is fast, rigorous and can accommodate a large range of geometric structures.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207