MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288729354 · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000001253

Aligning Nursing Ethics With Critical and Open Pedagogy in Nursing Education

2022· review· en· W4288729354 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kristin Petrovic, Beth Perry, Pamela Walsh

Bibliographic record

VenueNurse Educator · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Competency in Health Care
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingNurse educationNursing ethicsPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There is a need to increase access to nursing education that is meaningful and socially just. PURPOSE: To investigate the alignment of critical and open pedagogy in nursing education with nursing principles of ethics. METHOD: Narrative thematic synthesis literature review of Canadian and American sources related to nursing education. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of 29 full-text sources that align nursing ethical principles with critical and open pedagogy in nursing education. CONCLUSION: Critical and open pedagogy aligns with nursing practice ethics and facilitates meaningful and socially just nursing education experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.236
GPT teacher head0.613
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNurse EducatorSame topicCultural Competency in Health CareFrench-language works237,207