Longitudinal changes of deep gray matter shape in multiple sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate longitudinal deep gray matter (DGM) shape changes and their relationship with measures of clinical disability and white matter lesion-load in a large multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 230 MS patients (179 relapsing-remitting, 51 secondary progressive; baseline age 44.5 ± 11.3 years; baseline disease duration 12.99 ± 9.18) underwent annual clinical and MRI examinations over a maximum of 6 years (mean 4.32 ± 2.07 years). The DGM structures were segmented on the T1-weighted images using the "Multiple Automatically Generated Templates" brain algorithm. White matter lesion-load was measured on T2-weighted MRI. Clinical examination included the expanded disability status scale, 9-hole peg test, timed 25-foot walk test, symbol digit modalities test and paced auditory serial addition test. Vertex-wise longitudinal analysis of DGM shapes was performed using linear mixed effect models and evaluated the association between average/temporal changes of DGM shapes with average/temporal changes of clinical measurements, respectively. RESULTS: A significant shrinkage over time of the bilateral ventrolateral pallidal and the left posterolateral striatal surface was observed, whereas no significant shape changes over time were observed at the bilateral thalamic and right striatal surfaces. Higher average lesion-load was associated with an average inwards displacement of the global thalamic surface with relative sparing on the posterior side (slight left-side predominance), the antero-dorso-lateral striatal surfaces bilaterally (symmetric on both sides) and the antero-lateral pallidal surface (left-side predominance). There was also an association between shrinkage of large lateral DGM surfaces with higher clinical motor and cognitive disease severity. However, there was no correlation between any DGM shape changes over time and measurements of clinical progression or lesion-load changes over time. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed specific shape change of DGM structures occurring over time in relapse-onset MS. Although these shape changes over time were not associated with disease progression, we demonstrated a link between DGM shape and the patients' average disease severity as well as white matter lesion-load.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".