MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288738422 · doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2022.e01591

Anemia with elevation of growth differentiation factor-15 level in linezolid treated multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Case series of three patients

2022· article· en· W4288738422 on OpenAlexaff
Amaylia Oehadian, Prayudi Santoso, Dick Menzies, Rovina Ruslami

Bibliographic record

VenueIDCases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersUniversitas Padjadjaran
KeywordsLinezolidMedicineTuberculosisInternal medicineAnemiaToxicityMultiple drug resistanceGDF15GastroenterologyDrug resistancePharmacologyPathologyMicrobiologyStaphylococcus aureusVancomycinBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Linezolid is now recommended as a first line drug for Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Previous studies reported hematologic toxicity as one of the main side effects. The mechanism of this toxicity is mitochondrial dysfunction, for which a biomarker is Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15). There is no previous report about GDF-15 and its association with hematologic toxicity from Linezolid in the treatment of MDR-TB. We present three cases of MDR-TB involving severe anemia associated with linezolid who had GDF-15 elevation. These cases highlight the need for more research into the relationship between GDF-15 and hematologic toxicity in MDR-TB patients treated with linezolid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIDCasesSame topicGDF15 and Related BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207