Les peuples autochtones et le droit de propriété devant la Cour interaméricaine des droits de l'Homme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’accès à la terre est l’une des principales revendications des peuples autochtones car la terre fait partie de leur identité et garantit leur développement en tant que groupe. Tous les instruments internationaux relatifs aux droits des peuples autochtones font référence à la relation spéciale qui existe entre les peuples autochtones et la terre. Afin de reconnaître les particularités et les besoins des autochtones, la Cour interaméricaine des droits de l’Homme a interprété l’article 21 sur le droit de propriété en y intégrant les caractéristiques de la propriété telle que conçue par les peuples autochtones. La Cour a enrichi son contenu et développé des obligations concrètes que l’État doit satisfaire pour se conformer à la Convention américaine relative aux droits de l’Homme et rendre effectif le droit à la propriété pour ces groupes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".