MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288808590 · doi:10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100274

The application of surfactant-enhanced soil washing process combined with adsorption using a recoverable magnetic granular activated carbon for remediation of PAH-contaminated soil

2022· article· en· W4288808590 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Advances · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdsorptionPulmonary surfactantEnvironmental remediationChemistryEffluentContaminationActivated carbonSoil contaminationEnvironmental chemistrySolubilityAqueous two-phase systemAqueous solutionSoil waterChromatographyEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceOrganic chemistrySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficiency of surfactant-enhanced soil washing combined with adsorption for PAHs removal from a real contaminated soil and the feasibility of surfactant recycling were investigated in this study. A synthesized magnetic granular activated carbon (MGAC) composite was used as the adsorbent and Tween 80 was the surfactant employed in this research. The experimental data for the adsorption of PAHs by MGAC in aqueous phase were best fitted with the Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm model (0.66<R2<0.91), with the maximum PAH adsorption capacity of MGAC being in the range 6.2–10.9 µg/mL. According to the PAH solubilization tests, the increase in the Tween 80 dose from 1% to 5% (v/v) resulted in an increase in the total PAHs solubility up to ≈ 40%. The optimum ranges of the operational parameters for Tween 80-enhanced soil washing were determined as 5% Tween 80, a liquid to soil ratio of 10:1, a 72h washing time, and a temperature of 20°C. Under these conditions, the average PAHs percent removal from the contaminated soil was 67.6%. The remediation of contaminated soil samples using recycled 5% Tween 80 and 2% (w/w) MGAC (with no regeneration) was assessed in 7 successive cycles. The results indicated that the PAH removal efficiencies were 68.6, 70.7, 70.3, 61.6, 55.5, 50.2, and 39.4% for the repeated washing cycles, respectively. Tween 80 and the non-regenerated MGAC did not produce any waste or effluent after six times reuse in the treatment process. The surfactant adsorption tests showed that only 5 to 10% of Tween 80 would be adsorbed to the soil particles, suggesting the high recovery of the surfactant solution from the soil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it