Le Sahara et ses hydrocarbures, pivot des relations franco-algériennes : 1954 - 1971
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article s’intéresse au statut du Sahara dans les rapports franco-algériens. En se basant sur les documents d’archives du groupe pétrolier TOTAL et du ministère français des Affaires étrangères, nous analyserons la dimension pétrolière des relations entre les deux pays jusqu’à la nationalisation par l’Algérie du secteur pétrolier et gazier en 1971, tout en insistant sur la politique d’industrialisation de ce pays. Ainsi, nous démontrerons que le pétrole constitue le pivot des relations franco-algériennes jusqu’en 1971. Premièrement, jusqu’en 1962, le sort du Sahara et de ses ressources en hydrocarbures prolonge le conflit armé. Deuxièmement, les Accords d’Évian et plus tard l’accord de coopération de 1965 tentent d’instituer une forme de lien privilégié basé sur la coopération d’État à État entre une métropole et son ancienne colonie. Finalement, à partir de 1969 et l’échec de la coopération pétrolière, nous assistons à une banalisation des rapports entre les deux pays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".