MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4288875107 · doi:10.4000/books.pupo.23275

Bibliographie

2019· book-chapter· fr· W4288875107 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Pierce

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Paris Nanterre eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

a new orchestral score and preparing new 35mm prints from a restored negative.Mr. Pierce's research examines the connections between film history, copyright, distribution, exhibition, and ownership, and his articles have appeared in American Film, Film Comment, American Cinematographer, Film History, and The Moving Image.His seminal article, "The Legion of the Condemned: Why American Silent Films Perished," appeared in Film History in 1997 and was reprinted in This Film Is Dangerous, published in 2002 by the International Federation of Film Archives (FIAF).His reference book on the copyright status of films of the 1950s was published in 1989.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0290.049
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3270.147

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Paris Nanterre eBooksSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207