MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289110762 · doi:10.3390/buildings12081130

Nonlinear Seismic Assessment of a Historic Rubble Masonry Building via Simplified and Advanced Computational Approaches

2022· article· en· W4289110762 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBuildings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersParks Canada
KeywordsMasonryRubbleUnreinforced masonry buildingStructural engineeringKinematicsLimit analysisDiscrete element methodNonlinear systemEngineeringBlock (permutation group theory)Computer scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeologyFinite element methodGeometryMathematicsMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research presents a comprehensive nonlinear quasi-static seismic assessment of an unreinforced rubble masonry building, Bytown Museum in Ottawa, Canada, using discontinuum-based analyses. In the proposed modeling approach, non-uniform geometrical properties of rubble masonry walls are replicated via a group of rigid polyhedral blocks interacting along their boundaries based on the discrete element method (DEM). Once the adopted modeling strategy is validated, the nonlinear quasi-static analysis of the South and North façades of the Bytown Museum is performed. Special attention is given to the irregular block generation within the discontinuum analysis framework, where discrete element models are generated from high-resolution site recording data, representing the masonry morphology at a high level of detail. Then, the predicted collapse mechanisms from advanced computational models are further utilized to generate pre-defined macro-blocks in kinematic limit analyses, providing a simple alternative solution for seismic assessment. The results reveal the significant effect of openings and the construction technique (morphology) in unreinforced rubble masonry buildings that can play an important role in the structural capacity and behavior. Moreover, it is noted that DEM-based solutions provide lower seismic capacity compared to kinematic limit analyses. Finally, a noticeable sensitivity to the input parameters in the discrete element models is noted; therefore, characterization of material properties is necessary for reliable predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it