MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289281834 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.09351

A variationally separable splitting for the generalized-$α$ method for parabolic equations

2018· preprint· en· W4289281834 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pouria Behnoudfar, Victor M. Calo, Quanling Deng, P Minev

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCurtin Institute for Computation, Curtin University of TechnologyAmerican Chemical Society Petroleum Research FundCurtin University of TechnologyAustralian GovernmentCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionMegagrantsUniversity of Texas at Austin
KeywordsDiscretizationSeparable spaceMathematicsSolverNorm (philosophy)DissipationNabla symbolPartial differential equationTensor productApplied mathematicsDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Mathematical analysisMathematical optimizationPhysicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a variationally separable splitting technique for the generalized-$α$ method for solving parabolic partial differential equations. We develop a technique for a tensor-product mesh which results in a solver with a linear cost with respect to the total number of degrees of freedom in the system for multi-dimensional problems. We consider finite elements and isogeometric analysis for the spatial discretization. The overall method maintains user-controlled high-frequency dissipation while minimizing unwanted low-frequency dissipation. The method has second-order accuracy in time and optimal rates ($h^{p+1}$ in $L^2$ norm and $h^p$ in $L^2$ norm of $\nabla u$) in space. We present the spectrum analysis on the amplification matrix to establish that the method is unconditionally stable. Various numerical examples illustrate the performance of the overall methodology and show the optimal approximation accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207