MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289336424 · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.023501

Fundamental thermal noise in antiresonant hollow-core fibers

2022· article· en· W4289336424 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Michaud-Belleau, Eric Numkam Fokoua, Péter Horák, Natalie V. Wheeler, Shuichiro Rikimi, Thomas D. Bradley, David J. Richardson, Francesco Poletti, Jérôme Genest, Radan Slavı́k

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilRoyal Society
KeywordsNoise (video)InterferometryMaterials scienceCore (optical fiber)OpticsGyroscopeSensitivity (control systems)Optical fiberFiberThermalPhase noiseFiber laserAcousticsPhysicsComputer scienceElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To understand the effect of fundamental thermal noise in hollow-core optical fibers, the authors propose an adapted noise model and compare it to careful measurements. They find that the use of evacuated hollow cores could allow for an order-of-magnitude improvement in phase sensitivity with respect to standard fiber, enabling better precision in interferometric applications such as fiber gyroscopes and laser frequency stabilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207