MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289337916 · doi:10.1177/1357633x221115746

Implementation and evaluation of a pilot antenatal ultrasound imaging programme using tele-ultrasound in Ethiopia

2022· article· en· W4289337916 on OpenAlexafffund
Kemal Jemal, Dereje Ayana, Felagot Tadesse, Mulat Adefris, Mukemil Awol, Mengistu Tesema, Bewunetu Dagne, Sandra Abeje, Alehegn Bantie, Megan Butler, Chikezirim Nwoke, Zakhar Kanyuka, Scott Adams, Ivar Mendez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of SaskatchewanMcGill University Health Centre
FundersGlobal Affairs Canada
KeywordsMedicineConcordanceHealth careFamily medicineObstetrics and gynaecologyUltrasoundNursingPregnancyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound imaging is an important aspect of antenatal care, though access to antenatal ultrasound imaging is limited in many developing countries. The objective of this study was to evaluate a pilot programme which aimed to improve access to antenatal ultrasound for rural Ethiopians through enhanced training of healthcare providers (including midwives, nurses and clinical officers) with support remotely provided by obstetricians using a tele-ultrasound platform. METHODS: Thirteen healthcare providers in the North Shoa Zone in Ethiopia completed training to enable them to perform antenatal ultrasound with the remote supervision of an obstetrician via a tele-ultrasound platform. Pregnant women attending an antenatal appointment at two facilities were offered an antenatal ultrasound exam performed by one of the healthcare providers. Image interpretations between obstetricians and healthcare providers were compared. Participants and healthcare providers were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding their experience with tele-ultrasound, and participants, healthcare providers and obstetricians were interviewed regarding their experience with the tele-ultrasound pilot programme. RESULTS: 2795 pregnant women had an antenatal ultrasound exam. Of 100 exams randomly selected to assess concordance between healthcare providers' and obstetricians' image interpretations, concordance ranged from 79% to 100% for each parameter assessed. 99.4% of participants surveyed indicated that they would recommend antenatal ultrasound using tele-ultrasound to friends and family. Themes relating to participants' experiences of having a tele-ultrasound exam were reduced travel and cost, equivalence in quality of virtual care to in-person care and empowerment through diagnostic information. CONCLUSION: Healthcare provider-performed antenatal ultrasound - supported by obstetricians via tele-ultrasound - showed high levels of concordance, was well-received by participants and provided rural Ethiopian women with enhanced access to antenatal imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Telemedicine and TelecareSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207