MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289517746 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-qwjgp

A borindolizine platform for the design of fluorophores with tunable emissions

2022· preprint· en· W4289517746 on OpenAlexaff
Andrei K. Yudin, Chirag Apte, Nicholas W. Heller, Adam Marr, Kjell Jorner, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Reactivity of Heterocycles
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluorophoreFluorescenceScaffoldArylMaterials sciencePhotochemistryBoronStokes shiftRational designOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistryOpticsLuminescenceOrganic chemistryPhysicsBiomedical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new boron-containing heterocyclic scaffold – borindolizine – is reported as a new heterocyclic scaffold with broadly tunable fluorescence and a high Stokes shift. Two classes of emitters were synthesized through rational scaffold changes resulting in blue-emitting carboxyborindolizines (λmax,em = 431 – 459 nm) and green emitting aryl borindolizines (λmax,em = 488 – 519 nm). Experimental structure-emission trends were used to validate a computational spectral prediction model and subsequently used to design a red-emissive fluorophoric scaffold. A red-emissive (λmax,abs = 370 nm, λmax,em = 635 nm) isoquinolyl borinidolizine was synthesized in excellent agreement with the theoretical emission (λmax,em = 621 nm). These results establish borindolizine as a highly attractive class of fluorescent heterocycle with a highly tunable emission, allowing for custom fluorophore synthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicSynthesis and Reactivity of HeterocyclesFrench-language works237,207