Starting from the bottom: Coupling a genetic algorithm and pore network model for porous electrode design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The microstructure of porous electrodes determines multiple performance-defining properties, such as the available reactive surface area, mass transfer rates, hydraulic resistance, and electronic conductivity. Thus, optimizing the electrode architecture is a powerful approach to enhance the performance and cost-competitiveness of electrochemical technologies. To this goal, the deployment of computational modeling has improved the fundamental understanding of reactive transport in porous electrodes; however, to date, it has mostly been used to simulate existing sets of materials. To expand our current arsenal of materials, we need to build computational frameworks that are predictive and can explore a large geometrical design space while being physically robust. Here, we present a novel approach for the optimization of porous electrode microstructure from the bottom-up that couples a genetic algorithm with a chemistry-agnostic electrochemical pore network model. In this first demonstration, we focus on optimizing redox flow battery electrodes. The genetic algorithm manipulates the pore and throat size distributions of an artificially generated microstructure with fixed pore positions by selecting the best-performing networks, based on the hydraulic and electrochemical performance computed by the model. For the studied VO2+/VO2+ electrolyte, we find an increase in the fitness of 75% compared to the initial configuration. The algorithm improves the fluid distribution by the formation of a bimodal pore size distribution containing preferential longitudinal flow pathways, resulting in a decrease of 73% for the required pumping power. Furthermore, the optimization yielded an 47% increase in surface area resulting in an electrochemical performance improvement of 42%. Our results show the potential of using genetic algorithms combined with pore network models to optimize porous electrode microstructures for a wide range of electrolyte composition and operation conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".