Investigating the Effect of Network Traffic Signal Timing Strategy with Dynamic Variable Guidance Lanes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the effect of network signal timing strategy with dynamic variable guidance lanes based on a two-step approach, where the first step is an interactive traffic signal optimization model for each single interaction (e.g., lane allocation plans, cycle length) in the network, and the second refers to network signal control (e.g., split, off-sets). The optimization problem in the first step is solved using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-ΙΙ), and the network signal control problem in the second step is solved through SYNCHRO. To verify the effect of dynamic variable guidance lanes and also the reliability and validity of the proposed approach, a numerical case study is carried out. The results show that the average vehicle delay in the entire road network was reduced by 25.06% after optimization using the proposed model. Moreover, the sensitivity of influencing factors of the proposed model is also analyzed. The results show that when the traffic flow is increased by 60% of the original traffic flow, the optimization effect of the model is more significant. However, when the lane capacity is more than 1300 pcu/h, the vehicle delay will increase slowly. To sum up, this method can improve the regional traffic efficiency of the traffic-stressed lanes and further promote the full utilization of space-time resources of the road network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".