MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289530651 · doi:10.3917/rfe.221.0045

Confiance, vaccination et télétravail pendant la crise de la Covid-19

2022· article· fr· W4289530651 on OpenAlexaff
Serge Blondel, Sandra Chyderiotis, François Langot, Judith E. Mueller, Jonathan Sicsic

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française d économie · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsychology of Social Influence
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)HumanitiesPolitical science2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PhilosophyMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir d’une enquête originale menée fin novembre 2020, nous identifions les déterminants socio-démographiques et comportementaux d’adhésion aux mesures contre la Covid-19. Notre analyse porte sur l’acceptation du télétravail, les intentions de vaccination et la confiance dans la gestion de la crise par les autorités. Le goût pour les actions collectives est fortement et significativement associé à l’intention d’accepter la vaccination et à la confiance en les autorités. L’aversion pour le risque n’a jamais de rôle significatif et la préférence pour le présent seulement sur la confiance. Des facteurs exposant à un impact plus fort de la maladie (âge, sexe, présence d’autres facteurs de risque pour une Covid-19 grave, proche en Ehpad) permettent également d’expliquer les réponses des enquêtés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française d économieSame topicPsychology of Social InfluenceFrench-language works237,207