Design and Implementation of an Improved Metaheuristic Algorithm for Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm Based on a PV Emulator and a Double-Stage Grid-Connected System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research article proposes the optimization of a grid-connected photovoltaic system based on the PV emulator (PVE), the Boost converter, and a single-phase full-bridge inverter. The main objective is to track and extract the highest amount of power from the PV system working under variable solar irradiation while reducing losses and time response in each stage of the converter. As none, the main flaw of the classical maximum power point tracking algorithm (MPPT) is its performance. The control law design is based on a PI controller in the PVE, a meta heuristic whale optimization algorithm (WOA) in the MPPT, and a reduced switching finite set model predictive control (RS-FS-MPC) for the single-phase full-bridge inverter. The proposed control techniques inherit the property of robustness and successfully deal with the nonlinear behavior of the system. The performance validation and effectiveness of the proposed control techniques is supported by MATLAB/SIMULINK simulations and is also verified experimentally on various systems carried out under varying solar irradiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".