MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Performance Assessment of an Isolated DC Nanogrid with Boost Type Interfaces and Current-Mode Primary Control

2022· article· en· W4289532827 on OpenAlexaff
Jingdi Wang, Luiz A. C. Lopes, Ursula Eicker

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage droopCapacitorRenewable energyVoltageState of chargeEngineeringEnergy storageControl theory (sociology)AC powerElectronic engineeringComputer sciencePower controlControl (management)Power (physics)Electrical engineeringVoltage sourceBattery (electricity)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isolated DC nanogrids based on stochastic renewable energy sources and variable loads rely on Energy Storage (ES) units for voltage regulation and power quality. A hierarchical control architecture with primary and secondary layers is often used. This paper discusses the performance of an isolated DC nanogrid with Boost type interfaces and current-mode primary control. The former allows the use of low voltage distributed energy resources while the latter, the use of a single control loop in the primary control. A design approach for the output capacitor of the interface is proposed. It deals with the stability issue caused by the droop factor in primary control. This is verified by simulations as well as the impact of the State-of-Charge (SoC) control scheme of the ES units and secondary control on the voltage regulation of the DC nanogrid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207