MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289537926 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2022.3195978

Achievable Rate Analysis and Max-Min SINR Optimization in Intelligent Reflecting Surface Assisted Cell-Free MIMO Uplink

2022· article· en· W4289537926 on OpenAlexafffund
Qurrat-Ul-Ain Nadeem, Alessio Zappone, Anas Chaaban

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology
KeywordsTelecommunications linkMIMOComputer scienceChannel state informationMathematical optimizationOptimization problemChannel (broadcasting)Overhead (engineering)Signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioAlgorithmPower (physics)Control theory (sociology)MathematicsTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the uplink transmission in an intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) assisted cell-free multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system where the central processing unit (CPU) only has statistical channel state information (CSI) to detect symbols, and to design the receiver filter coefficients, the power allocations, and the IRS phase shifts. The access points (APs) estimate only their local end-to-end channels with the users using minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimation to implement matched filtering, thereby avoiding the large overhead associated with estimating individual IRS-assisted channels. Under this framework, we derive a closed-form expression for the achievable uplink net rate that only depends on the channel statistics. Using this expression, we formulate the problem of maximizing the minimum (max-min) signal-to-interference plus noise ratio (SINR) to design the receiver filter coefficients at the CPU, the power allocations at the users, and the phase shifts at the IRS, subject to per user power constraints as well as IRS phase shift resolution constraints. The resulting problem is jointly non-convex in the three design variables and is solved using an alternating optimization algorithm. In particular, the receiver filter design is formulated as a generalized eigenvalue problem leading to a closed-form solution, the power allocation problem is solved using a geometric programming (GP) approach, and the IRS phase shifts are designed using an alternating maximization algorithm. For comparison, we also formulate and solve the max-min SINR problem for the scenario where the instantaneous imperfect CSI of all individual direct and IRS-assisted channels is available at the CPU. Numerical results show that the scheme designed using statistical CSI has the potential to outperform the scheme based on instantaneous CSI for moderate to large number of IRS elements, due to savings in the channel estimation overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207