MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4289541593 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1432737

Global Rehab Equipment Market is Projected to Reach US$ 15 Billion By 2022

2018· article· en· W4289541593 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessCommerce

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Market Research Engine has published a new report titled as “Rehab Equipment Market By Type Analysis (Daily Living Aids, Mobility Equipment, Exercise Equipment, Body Support Devices); By Application Analysis (Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy); By End User Analysis (Hospitals & Clinics, Rehabilitation Centers, Home Care Settings, Physiotherapy Centers) and By Regional Analysis – Global Forecast by 2016 - 2022”.\n\nRehab equipment or rehabilitation equipment is the physical therapists exercise equipment. Since the establishment of the long-term care insurance system general society enthusiasm for restoration equipment, and accordingly the quantity of clients has expanded. This pattern additionally come about into upgrades in the capacity and plan of such equipment which incredibly benefits the matured population and physically tested to accomplish more prominent freedom and take an interest in the public eye. Rehab equipment is a re-usable guide which helps the patient with their everyday exercises. Depending upon the type of recovering the patient will undergo, different types of rehab equipment will be required. Physical therapy, hydrotherapy, and electrotherapy are all means through which recovery can take place. \n\nThe Rehab Equipment Market is expected to exceed more than US$ 14.91 Billion by 2022 at a CAGR of 8.6% in the given forecast period.\n\n You Can Browse Full Report @: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/rehab-equipment-market\n\nThe major driving factors of Rehab Equipment Market are as follows:\n\n\n\tRising occurrence of handicaps\n\tFavorable healthcare reforms\n\tRapid development in geriatric population\n\n\nThe restraining factors of Rehab Equipment Market are as follows:\n\n\n\tAbsence of standard pricing, high price of rehabilitation products\n\n\nThe Rehab Equipment Market is segmented on the lines of its type, application, end user and regional. Based on type segmentation it covers daily living aids, mobility equipment, exercise equipment, body support devices. Based on application it coversphysiotherapy, occupational therapy. Based on end user segmentation it covers hospitals & clinics, rehabilitation centers, home care settings, physiotherapy centers. The Rehab Equipment Market on geographic segmentation covers various regions such as North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa. Each geographic market is further segmented to provide market revenue for select countries such as the U.S., Canada, U.K. Germany, China, Japan, India, Brazil, and GCC countries.\n\nThis report provides:\n \n1) An overview of the global market for Rehab Equipment Market and related technologies.\n2) Analyses of global market trends, with data from 2013, estimates for 2014 and 2015, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2022.\n3) Identifications of new market opportunities and targeted promotional plans for Rehab Equipment Market.\n4) Discussion of research and development, and the demand for new products and new applications.\n5) Comprehensive company profiles of major players in the industry.\n\nREPORT SCOPE: \n\nThe scope of the report includes a detailed study of global and regional markets on Rehab Equipment Market with the reasons given for variations in the growth of the industry in certain regions.\n \nThe report covers detailed competitive outlook including the market share and company profiles of the key participants operating in the global market. Key players profiled in the report include Medline Industries, Inc. (U.S.), Dynatronics Corporation (U.S.), Changzhou Qian Jing Rehabilitation Co., Ltd. (China), Carex Health Brands (U.S.), Roma Medical (U.K.), Invacare Corporation (U.S.), Caremax Rehabilitation Equipment Co. Ltd. (China), GF Health Products, Inc. (U.S.), and Hospital Equipment Manufacturing Company (India), Drive DeVilbiss Healthcare (U.S.),. Company profile includes assign such as company summary, financial summary, business strategy and planning, SWOT analysis and current developments. \n\nThe Rehab Equipment Market has been segmented as below: (Accordingly)\n\nBy Type Analysis:\n\n\n\tDaily Living Aids\n\t\n\t\tMedical Beds\n\t\tBathroom & Toilet Assist Devices\n\t\tReading, Writing & Computing Aids\n\t\n\t\n\tMobility Equipment\n\t\n\t\tWheelchairs & Scooters\n\t\tWalking Assist Devices\n\t\n\t\n\tExercise Equipment\n\t\n\t\tLower Body Exercise Equipment\n\t\tUpper Body Exercise Equipment\n\t\tTotal Body Exercise Equipment\n\t\n\t\n\tBody Support Devices\n\t\n\t\tPatient Lifts\n\t\tMedical Lifting Slings\n\t\n\t\n\n\nBy Application Analysis:\n\n\n\tPhysiotherapy\n\tOccupational Therapy\n\n\nBy End User Analysis:\n\n\n\tHospitals & Clinics\n\tRehabilitation Centers\n\tHome Care Settings\n\tPhysiotherapy Centers\n\n\nBy Regional Analysis:\n\n\n\tNorth America\n\tEurope\n\tAsia-Pacific\n\tRest of the World\n\n\n Request Sample Report: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/rehab-equipment-market\n\n \n\n \n\nTable of Contents\n\n1 INTRODUCTION\n\n2 Research Methodology\n\n3 Executive Summary\n\n4 Premium Insights\n\n5 Market Overview\n\n6 Rehabilitation Equipment Market, By Type\n\n7 Rehabilitation Equipment Market, By Application\n\n8 Rehabilitation Equipment Market, By End User\n\n9 Rehabilitation Equipment Market, By Region\n\n10 Competitive Landscape\n\n11 Company Profiles\n\n 11.1 Introduction\n\n 11.2 Invacare Corporation\n\n 11.3 Medline Industries, Inc.\n\n 11.4 Dynatronics Corporation\n\n 11.5 Drive Devilbiss Healthcare\n\n 11.6 Changzhou Qian Jing Rehabilitation Co., Ltd.\n\n 11.7 Carex Health Brands (Subsidiary of Compass Health Brands)\n\n 11.8 ROMA Medical\n\n 11.9 Caremax Rehabilitation Equipment Co. Ltd.\n\n 11.10 GF Health Products, Inc.\n\n 11.11 HEMC (Hospital Equipment Manufacturing Company)\n\n \n\nMedia Contact\n\nCompany Name: Market Research Engine\n\nContact Person: John Bay\n\nEmail: john@marketresearchengine.com\n\nPhone: +1-855-984-1862\n\nCountry: United States\n\nWebsite: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2060.174

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→