Akte-Liquid: Acoustic-based Liquid Identification with Smartphones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liquid identification plays an essential role in our daily lives. However, existing RF sensing approaches still require dedicated hardware such as RFID readers and UWB transceivers, which are not readily available to most users. In this article, we propose Akte-Liquid, which leverages the speaker on smartphones to transmit acoustic signals, and the microphone on smartphones to receive reflected signals to identify liquid types and analyze the liquid concentration. Our work arises from the acoustic intrinsic impedance property of liquids, in that different liquids have different intrinsic impedance, causing reflected acoustic signals of liquids to differ. Then, we discover that the amplitude-frequency feature of reflected signals may be utilized to represent the liquid feature. With this insight, we propose new mechanisms to eliminate the interference caused by hardware and multi-path propagation effects to extract the liquid features. In addition, we design a new Siamese network-based structure with a specific training sample selection mechanism to reconstruct the extracted feature to container-irrelevant features. Our experimental evaluations demonstrate that Akte-Liquid is able to distinguish 20 types of liquids at a higher accuracy, and to identify food additives and measure protein concentration in the artificial urine with a 92.3% accuracy under 1 mg/100 mL as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".