MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289599230 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.08573

Geometric vertex decomposition, Gröbner bases, and Frobenius splittings for regular nilpotent Hessenberg varieties

2022· preprint· en· W4289599230 on OpenAlexaff
Sergio Da Silva, Megumi Harada

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsNilpotentVertex (graph theory)Affine varietyAffine transformationPure mathematicsGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We initiate a study of the Gröbner geometry of local defining ideals of Hessenberg varieties by studying the special case of regular nilpotent Hessenberg varieties in Lie type A, and focusing on the affine coordinate chart on $\mathrm{Flags}(\mathbb{C}^n) \cong GL_n(\mathbb{C})/B$ corresponding to the longest element $w_0$ of the Weyl group $S_n$ of $GL_n(\mathbb{C})$. Our main results are as follows. Let $h$ be an indecomposable Hessenberg function. We prove that the local defining ideal $I_{w_0,h}$ in the $w_0$-chart of the regular nilpotent Hessenberg variety $\mathrm{Hess}(\mathsf{N},h)$ associated to $h$ has a Gröbner basis with respect to a suitably chosen monomial order. Our Gröbner basis consists of a collection $\{f^{w_0}_{k,\ell}\}$ of generators of $I_{w_0,h}$ obtained by Abe, DeDieu, Galetto, and the second author. We also prove that $I_{w_0,h}$ is geometrically vertex decomposable in the sense of Klein and Rajchgot (building on work of Knutson, Miller, and Yong). We give two distinct proofs of the above results. We make this unconventional choice of exposition because our first proof introduces and utilizes a notion of a triangular complete intersection which is of independent interest, while our second proof using liaison theory is more likely to be generalizable to the general $w$-charts for $w \neq w_0$. Finally, using our Gröbner analysis of the $f^{w_0}_{k,\ell}$ above and for $p>0$ any prime, we construct an explicit Frobenius splitting of the $w_0$-chart of $\mathrm{Flags}(\mathbb{C}^n)$ which simultaneously compatibly splits all the local defining ideals of $I_{w_0,h}$, as $h$ ranges over the set of indecomposable Hessenberg functions. This last result is a local Hessenberg analogue of a classical result known for $\mathrm{Flags}(\mathbb{C}^n)$ and the collection of Schubert and opposite Schubert varieties in $\mathrm{Flags}(\mathbb{C}^n)$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207