Analysis of the Impact of Ride-Hailing on Urban Road Network Traffic by Using Vehicle Trajectory Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growth of ride-hailing services has made people’s daily commutes more convenient but has increased traffic on the road. However, the data needed to verify the impact of ride-hailing services on the urban road traffic network are lacking. This study matches data on the trajectories of different kinds of vehicles in Xuancheng city in the urban road network by using vehicle information data, ride-hailing information data, and license plate data recorded by the traffic bayonet system from December 26, 2018, to January 25, 2019. We used two indices, the detecting intensity and the detecting rate, to analyze the characteristics of travel based on ride-hailing services in Xuancheng. The results show that the ride-hailing vehicles have obvious travel characteristics of morning peak and evening peak, and in central urban areas and through the proposed indices of the travel time occupation rate and the travel space occupation rate to further quantitatively analyze the spatial and temporal characteristics of travel of different kinds of vehicles. Following this, we calculated the average ratios of different kinds of vehicles on congested sections of the road network and used simple regression to analyze the relationship between this and the average speed on these sections to quantitatively analyze the impact of ride-hailing on traffic congestion. The work here can provide effective decision-making support to the government for managing travel based on ride-hailing services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".