MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Converting a 1×K Static Rayleigh Channel to K Parallel AWGN Using Media-based Modulation

2022· article· en· W4289655226 on OpenAlexaff
Ehsan Seifi, Amir K. Khandani

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooCiena (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdditive white Gaussian noiseIndependent and identically distributed random variablesChannel (broadcasting)Topology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmModulation (music)Computer scienceDecoding methodsTelecommunicationsMathematicsRandom variablePhysicsStatisticsCombinatoricsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The idea of media-based modulation (MBM) [1] [2] is to embed information in the variations of the transmission media (channel states). Using a single traditional antenna surrounded by a closure with w radio frequency (RF) walls, MBM creates a set of 2wstates for the end-to-end channel, and the data is mapped into the index of these channel states. Each channel state results in an independent complex channel gain to each receive antenna, which specifies an MBM constellation point coordinate. In a rich scattering environment, MBM constellation points are independent of each other, with coordinates that follow an independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) complex Gaussian density. In a 1 ×K MBM, this property mimics the random code-book generation for signaling over K parallel additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels. Accordingly, it is shown in [2] that the capacity of a 1 ×K MBM system with one unit of transmit energy and AWGN variance σ2over each receive antenna is equal to K times the capacity of an AWGN with a signal to noise ratio of snr = 1/σ2. The current article provides an alternative proof based on a novel formulation that reveals several interesting features of MBM. It is shown that the capacity in a 1×K MBM, as a random variable defined over the sample space of MBM constellation of cardinality M, follows a normal distribution with a mean of K log(1 + snr) and variance of (K/M)(snr/(1 + snr))2→ 0 as the M →∞. This entails, in contrast to legacy MIMO where the singularity of the channel matrix governs the outage probability, in MBM the outage is determined by the realized energy of the MBM constellation, and for any multiplexing gain r < K, the outage probability decreases exponentially fast as the number of points increases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207