MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289711260 · doi:10.1002/adfm.202205142

Stabilization, Characterization, and Electrochemical Applications of High‐Entropy Oxides: Critical Assessment of Crystal Phase–Properties Relationship

2022· article· en· W4289711260 on OpenAlexaff
Gracita M. Tomboc, Xiandi Zhang, Songa Choi, Dae-Kyu Kim, Lawrence Yoon Suk Lee, Kwangyeol Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsMaterials scienceCharacterization (materials science)ElectrochemistryNanotechnologyCrystal structureChemical physicsElectrodePhysical chemistryPhysicsCrystallographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High‐entropy oxides (HEOs), a class of newly emerging energy conversion and storage technology materials, have gained significant interest due to their unique structure, complex stoichiometry, and corresponding synergetic effect. Despite the increasing number of reported studies related to HEOs in recent years, details of their structural properties and electrochemical activities are still lacking. Herein, the exciting developments of HEOs regarding their design, synthesis, characterization, theoretical calculations, and electrochemical performances are outlined. The fundamentals of HEOs, including their strict definition, main features, and four‐core aspect effects are presented. The different synthetic methods of HEOs are categorized to highlight the significance of parameter optimization to ensure the single‐phase stability of HEOs. The advances in characterization techniques on the local lattice and atomic distribution and the basic principles of combinatorial screening methods based on computational techniques are also elaborated. Recent HEO‐based electrode/electrocatalysts toward Li‐ion batteries and oxygen catalysis are reviewed to assess the potential applications of HEOs. This review draws attention to the critical challenges of HEOs that are worth more extensive explorations in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations162
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207