MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Encrypted Network Traffic Classification in SDN using Self-supervised Learning

2022· article· en· W4289713073 on OpenAlex
Md. Shamim Towhid, Nashid Shahriar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraffic classificationComputer scienceTestbedEncryptionSoftware-defined networkingTraffic generation modelArtificial intelligenceMachine learningField (mathematics)Supervised learningData miningComputer networkArtificial neural networkQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network traffic classification has a huge application in software-defined networking (SDN) where we talk about more control over the network traffic. With the increase of encrypted protocols in the network, the problem of traffic classification has become extremely challenging. Many researchers have proposed different techniques to do traffic classification. This demo paper presents an application of our proposed method for traffic classification in an SDN environment. The proposed method leverages one of the self-supervised learning approaches, an emerging field of deep learning, to classify network traffic. This paper shows that the proposed method can outperform the corresponding supervised approach by $\sim 2$% in terms of accuracy using data collected from an SDN testbed. Furthermore, an SDN application is developed to show that the trained model is able to classify real-time traffic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it