MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289731495 · doi:10.1113/ep090367

Training‐induced improvements in knee extensor force accuracy are associated with reduced vastus lateralis motor unit firing variability

2022· article· en· W4289731495 on OpenAlexaff
Isabel A. Ely, Eleanor J. Jones, Thomas B. Inns, Síobhra Dooley, Sarah Miller, Daniel W. Stashuk, Philip J. Atherton, Bethan E. Phillips, Mathew Piasecki

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreVersus ArthritisMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsIsometric exerciseMotor unitPhysical medicine and rehabilitationElectromyographyMedicineVastus lateralis muscleMotor unit recruitmentPhysical therapyAnatomySkeletal muscle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Can bilateral knee extensor force accuracy be improved following 4 weeks of unilateral force accuracy training and are there any subsequent alterations to central and/or peripheral motor unit features? What is the main finding and its importance? In the trained limb only, knee extensor force tracking accuracy improved with reduced motor unit firing rate variability in the vastus lateralis, and there was no change to neuromuscular junction transmission instability. Interventional strategies to improve force accuracy may be directed to older/clinical populations where such improvements may aid performance of daily living activities. Abstract Muscle force output during sustained submaximal isometric contractions fluctuates around an average value and is partly influenced by variation in motor unit (MU) firing rates. MU firing rate (FR) variability seemingly reduces following exercise training interventions; however, much less is known with respect to peripheral MU properties. We therefore investigated whether targeted force accuracy training could lead to improved muscle functional capacity and control, in addition to determining any alterations of individual MU features. Ten healthy participants (seven females, three males, 27 ± 6 years, 170 ± 8 cm, 69 ± 16 kg) underwent a 4‐week supervised, unilateral knee extensor force accuracy training intervention. The coefficient of variation for force (FORCE CoV ) and sinusoidal wave force tracking accuracy (FORCE Sinu ) were determined at 25% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) pre‐ and post‐training. Intramuscular electromyography was utilised to record individual MU potentials from the vastus lateralis (VL) muscles at 25% MVC during sustained contractions, pre‐ and post‐training. Knee extensor muscle strength remained unchanged following training, with no improvements in unilateral leg‐balance. FORCE CoV and FORCE Sinu significantly improved in only the trained knee extensors by ∼13% ( P = 0.01) and ∼30% ( P < 0.0001), respectively. MU FR variability significantly reduced in the trained VL by ∼16% ( n = 8; P = 0.001), with no further alterations to MU FR or neuromuscular junction transmission instability. Our results suggest muscle force control and tracking accuracy is a trainable characteristic in the knee extensors, which is likely explained by the reduction in MU FR variability which was apparent in the trained limb only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207