MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289732375 · doi:10.20883/amp.2022/9

The noble jugglery. Unfortunate visionary at the time of scientific revolution

2022· article· pl· W4289732375 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michał Początek

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Medicorum Polonorum · 2022
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artykuł przedstawia życie i działalność naukową Alberta Wojciecha Adamkiewicza (1850-1921), neurofizjologa, neuroanatoma, neuropatologa i neurologa, niezwykłego i wybitnego uczonego, który żył w okresie burzliwego rozwoju nauk medycznych i przyrodniczych w Europie XIX wieku. Adamkiewicz był beneficjentem, a zarazem ofiarą swoich czasów oraz własnego geniuszu. Jego błyskotliwa kariera akademicka załamała się niespodziewanie i spektakularnie. Znaczący i niewątpliwy wkład Adamkiewicza do dorobku polskiej i europejskiej neurologii został przez historię oceniony dwuznacznie, ze względu na wady charakteru uczonego, złe osobiste decyzje życiowe, a być może po prostu wskutek niedostrzeżonych przez środowisko akademików i lekarzy objawów poważnej choroby.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Medicorum PolonorumSame topicNeurology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207