MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4289767955 · doi:10.55227/ijhet.v1i2.10

Decision Support System In Land Selection For Rubber Tree Planting Using The Moora Method

2022· article· en· W4289767955 on OpenAlex
Eliza Amanda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Health Engineering and Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDecision Support System Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Natural rubberAgricultural engineeringProductivityDecision treeProcess (computing)Quality (philosophy)Decision support systemSelection (genetic algorithm)Tree plantingComputer scienceEngineeringEnvironmental scienceMathematicsAgroforestryStatisticsData miningArtificial intelligenceEconomicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decision support system in the selection of land for rubber tree planting in order to minimize time and help PT. GERGAS UTAMA to determine quality land so as to increase rubber productivity. This method also has a good level of selectivity because it can determine the purpose of conflicting criteria. Where the criteria can be profitable (benefit) or unfavorable (cost). The selection of the right rubber area will certainly affect the production of rubber plants. In the process of selecting the right rubber area, of course, there are several criteria that will determine whether or not a land is suitable for producing rubber plantations such as temperature, rainfall, drainage, soil texture and so on. PT Gergas Utama has difficulty in the process of selecting this land because the selection process is still done manually which of course will take longer so that it becomes ineffective and affects the productivity of the rubber plant.Based on the description above, it is necessary to build a decision support system in the selection of land for rubber tree planting in order to minimize time and help PT Gergas Utama to determine quality land so as to increase rubber productivity. In the development of this decision support system, the MOORA (Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis) method is used, which is a method that has a level of flexibility and ease of understanding in separating the subjective part of an evaluation process into decision weight criteria with several decision-making attributes. The program used in the development of the Decision Support System is PHP for a web-based system and MySQL as a database management system. The results ofthis program indicate that the Decision Support System for the selection of land for planting rubber trees can be utilized by PT. GERGAS UTAMA is the rubber plantation sector in selecting the best land for planting. The results of the ranking calculation from the MOORA (Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis) method from a total of 10 rubber land planting locations with a value of 0.369, the result of the sum of the criteria weights being the highest. the best has the highest value of 0.369.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it